Friday, May 9, 2014

curiosity


CURIOSITY

 

Having inspected the gold-plated darts Ralph Ellison and Albert Murray threw at Richard Wright in their letters to one another, I let curiosity win the night when I picked up

Bennard, Emily, ed. Remember Me to Harlem: The Letters of Langston Hughes and Carl Van Vechten. New York: Random House, 2001.

Hughes is charming and tactful as he tutors the author and lover of Nigger Heaven about the dignity of black folk. Hughes is sensitive to the need to treat adults who suffer hyperactive curiosity with compassion.  Hughes sends them “two pale emerald frogs with onyx eyes” (186).

On June 15, 1938, Hughes informed Van Vechten that Wright was “in seclusion in Brooklyn and is hard to get at.  Working on a new novel….” (142)  A year later, Van Vechten photographed Wright on June 23, 1939.  In fall 1939, Hughes thanks Van Vechten “….for the picture.  Also the card of Dick Wright, which I think is excellent….” (150). On December 9, 1939, Hughes is asking Van Vechten “Did you hear that Richard Wright’s book is to be the Book-Of-The-Month for January?  I hope it is true. ( 161)  Bennard notes (162) that Arna Bontemps’s November 24, 1939 letter to Hughes indicated Native Son had been chosen. Van Vechten’s reply after December 9, 1939 reveals what it conceals: “I hadn’t heard about Wright’s book, but it is probably true as publication has been postponed” (163).

 Hughes had no reason to feel threatened by Wright’s success or to envy it.  Bennard notes that in his February 29, 1940 letter to Wright, Hughes proclaimed that Native Son “is a tremendous performance!” Still, Hughes did not wish for performance to be confused with reality. Speaking at the Chicago Public Library, April 28, 1940, he suggested the audience should know that “Bigger was not “representative of all blacks.  Five days earlier, he had signified to Van Vechten that “The South Side is a solid sender.  I keep looking for Bigger running over the roof tops.  See plenty of his brothers in the streets” (172).  Seventy years later, the real Biggers in America are a lighter shade of pale.

Hughes had a sharp eye for paradox, and Van Vechten had a sharp intuition for what might be destined. He wrote to Hughes on August 25, 1944 that Wright’s two-part article “I Tried to be a Communist” (August and September issues of Atlantic Monthly) was “obviously a part of the autobiography he is writing and if it is all like this it will be interesting to read” (230) Van Vechten also was capable of sending Hughes two onyx frogs with emerald eyes and pink mouths.  When the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) harassed Hughes and other artists, Van Vechten offered him cold comfort: March 9, 1948 –“Dear Langston, To mix metaphors the wages of writing controversially about politics is that you have to face the music.  It will be worse, you know, before it is better, and if there is a war I dare say they’ll pop you in a nice clean jail…Poor Langston!” (253). If the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) was actually free to provide information, we might know more than we do about what Van Vechten knew that Hughes did not know. More than Addison Gayle was able to tell us in Richard Wright: Ordeal of a Native Son (1980). More than Arnold Rampersad disclosed in The Life of Langston Hughes, Vol. II: 1941-1967.

Hughes was in California when the play Native Son opened in New York.  He wrote on April 5, 1941 “Wish I could see NATIVE SON and PAL JOEY.” to Van Vechten. Hughes did see Ketti Frings’s dramatic adaptation of Wright’s The Long Dream and wrote in his Chicago Defender column of March 3, 1960 that the adaptation could alarm. “Dear Lord! How long is the list of plays in which the Negro is defeated in the end! (308). What a fine implied question. What a solid reason to satisfy curiosity by “interrogating” The Long Dream: A New Play by Ketti Frings (Special Collections, University of California, Davis, D-207 135:9).

Like many of us, Hughes was not immune to gossip; his correspondence with Van Vechten is full of it.  Should curiosity limit itself to what Hughes wrote to Van Vechten, to how Van Vechten replied, we begin to commend Hughes for integrity.

 

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

May 8, 2014

Tuesday, May 6, 2014

Sherman Alexie


Sherman Alexie: Wicked Goodness of the Blues

 

If American rappers were disposed to deliver critical humor to the ears of the world, they would appropriate (steal) as much from Sherman Alexie as they do from James Brown.  They would give a reciprocal salute to Alexie’s “borrowing” of Robert Johnson, “Cross Roads Blues” and “Preaching Blues” to specify Africanist presence in our vernacular imaginations. In the novel Reservation Blues (1995), Alexie voiced the nexus of the gifts of black folk with Spokane/Coeur d’Alene lore, thereby teaching priceless lessons about multicultural humor. The Japanese manga artist Akira Hiramoto was equally multicultural in Me and the Devil Blues 1: The Unreal Life of Robert Johnson (2008), and his book was soul-disturbingly successful if one puts actual history under erasure.  The transnational aesthetics of his gesture do not fit as nicely within the parameters of American experiences as do Alexie’s transcultural articulations.  Hiramoto’s textuality falls a bit short in negotiating the wicked goodness of the blues that is a touchstone in Alexie’s writing.

 Alexie recognizes that in contemporary American life dancing with the Devil is the first step toward eternal salvation.  He is not crippled by double or triple consciousness. He freely engages the African, the European, and the Asian. He maximizes certain possibilities of blues critique that emerges when the ethos behind the music is touched by indigenous common sense.  He redirects the streams that flow in the blues/jazz poetry of Sterling D. Plumpp.

We can laugh outside the barrel with The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, Flight, and Indian Killer, but we ought to attend as well to his short stories. In the collection War Dances (2009), for example, “Breaking and Entering” and “The Senator’s Son” demonstrate Alexie’s mastery of conceptualizing and rendering “story,” an art that surpasses the writing of competent fiction. His quest for precise language in “Breaking and Entering” makes for rewarding reading; in “The Senator’s Son,” he plays the racial “dozens” by defamiliarizing “motherf___” as “fatherf_____.” Thus, he translates a peculiar Africanist ritual into a political instrument. It might be argued that Alexis re (w) raps certain aspects of the vernacular and injects them into the literary body of the multicultural biotext. By laughing with skeletons, Alexie uses the wicked goodness of the blues to enhance moral dimensions of tragicomic discourses.

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

May 6, 2014

Sunday, May 4, 2014

Ramcat Reads #3


Ramcat Reads #3

 

Baldwin, James. Jimmy’s Blues and Other Poems. Boston: Beacon, 2014. Graced by Nikky Finny’s poignant introduction, this reissue of Jimmy’s Blues (1983) along with six previously hard to find poems may bring overdue attention to the genuine poetry that informed the total body of his writing.

 

Bell, Bernard W. Bearing Witness to African American Literature: Validating and Valorizing Its Authority, Authenticity, and Agency. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2012.  By compiling twenty-three of his lectures and essays from 1968 to 2008, Bell gives us a record of his contributions to scholarship and criticism. This book is reminiscent of Blyden Jackson’s The Waiting Years: Essays on American Negro Literature (Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 1976). Special notice should be given to Bell’s introduction wherein he “seeks to offer a useful personal model of rites of passage …for assessing the authenticity, authority, and agency of a revisionist African Americentric critic and text” (20). Other models of rites of passage might be found in the multiple critical contributions of Amiri Baraka, Trudier Harris, Houston A. Baker, Jr., Joyce Ann Joyce, Hortense Spillers, bell hooks, Ron Baxter Miller, and Thadious Davis.  Like these important thinkers, Bell is quite conscious of being in a tradition of radical affirmation regarding the uses of literacy and literature in the United States.

Clark, Keith. The Radical Fiction of Ann Petry.  Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 2013.Clark is widely respected as an expert on matters of masculinity, sexuality, and gender.  His sensitive study of Ann Petry’s poetics is an expansion of his critical imagination, and it supplements the pioneering work of Hazel Arnett Ervin in Ann Petry: A Bio-Bibliography (1993). Clark makes an on-time and very readable intervention in the study of American social realism.

Cole, Teju. Open City. New York: Random House, 2011. Cole’s first novel is an example of the growing interest in destroying the thin line between pure fiction and autobiographical witnessing. Less emotionally challenging than Carl Hancock Rux’s Asphalt and less wickedly funny than the novels of Colson Whitehead, Open City is an attractive experiment in how an ego can walk in global urban spaces in an effort to make sense of African, American and European structures of experience. The novel invites us to rethink the nature of continuity and change in African American writing. Ultimately, we must answer a quite dreadful question: Does literature as literature lead us into a tunnel of no return?

Derricotte, Toi and Cornelius Eady, eds. Gathering Ground: A Reader Celebrating Cave Canem’s First Decade. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006. Without doubt, Cave Canem has nurtured many very good poets and has modified discourses about modern and contemporary poetics. The claim, however, that Gathering Ground “assembles in one place the most innovative voices in contemporary African American poetry” is hyperbolic. Many of the most innovative African American poets do not have their works represented in this collection.

Dungy, Camille T., ed. Black Nature: Four Centuries of African American Nature Poetry.  Dungy’s anthology makes a very strong case for the powerful centrality of ecological poetics in the long tradition of black poetry.

Jahannes,  Ja  A.  The Prayer Stone.  Savannah, GA: TMP Publishing, 2014. From Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, Paul Laurence Dunbar, James Weldon Johnson, Langston Hughes, Gwendolyn Brooks, and Margaret Walker until the present, it is not uncommon for our poets to write novels which are informed by the uncanny insights of poetry. Ja A. Jahannes has joined that distinguished company with The Prayer Stone. Like some of Octavia Butler’s fictions, this novel explores the seldom used power of the mind to negotiate between the material and the spiritual.  Jahannes emancipates the mythos of Southern fiction in order to enthrall and tantalize readers with multicultural permutations.  As a twenty-first century novel, The Prayer Stone challenges us to meditate on the hidden dimensions of our being-in-this-world. Reading this novel is a transformative experience.

In TruthFeasting (Savannah, GA: TMP Publishing, 2012), Jahannes collected some of his best culture-bound, truth-telling poems, but his most remarkable contribution to the study of black writing is WordSong Poets: A Memoir Anthology (Savannah, GA: TMP Publishing, 2011). The anthology creates a space for considering fortuity in the unfolding of diasporic poetry.  Combining a sensitive, creatively-angled memoir with illustrative poems, Jahannes pays a special tribute to his fellow-poets, who were all alumni of historically black Lincoln University (PA), as a source for acquiring and using literacy to affirm humanity and triumph over the negativity of our always hostile world.  Reminiscent of Eugene B. Redmond’s Drumvoices: The Mission of Afro-American Poetry (1976), WordSong Poets bids us to meditate with Jahannes on an oral/print/aural lineage extending from the cultural articulations of Langston Hughes to the cultural recuperations of Gil Scott-Herron.  Thus, Jahannes make a noteworthy contribution to our ongoing study of the efferent, aesthetic, and social aspects of poetry as an act of human necessity. He directs attention to the poetic kinship of Hughes, Larry Neal, Keorapetse William Kgositsile, Everett Hoagland, himself, Ron Welburn, and Scott-Heron.  His specialized work in literary history reminds us that we should have an anthology of writers who are alumni of Howard University.

 

Johnson, Nicholas. Negroes and the Gun: The Black Tradition of Arms.  Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2014.  The entitlement of African Americans to defend their lives and property must be weighed against the radical extremes of the National Rifle Association which threaten to transform the United States, under misinterpretation of the Second Amendment, into a right-to-kill-without-penalty society. Johnson’s book urges us to remember the heroic assertion of Robert Williams, president of the Monroe, North Carolina NAACP chapter, in exercising the right to self-defense in the late 1950s and the equally heroic posture of Mississippi’s Hartman Turnbow in bearing arms during the deadly years of the Civil Rights Movement. This timely review of the long tradition of black folks’ bearing arms, however, must be read against our contemporary history of irresponsible use of guns in America, especially in light of increased assaults on unarmed African American citizens.

 

Leak, Jeffrey B. Visible Man: The Life of Henry Dumas.  Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2014.

He was brilliant.  He was troubled.  He was dead at the age of 34.  Like many males of his class and generation, he was a death-bound-subject, a player in the game regulated by the racial contract of the United States of America. “While he certainly should be understood in the context of the cultural and political movements of the 1960s –Black Arts, Black Power, and Civil Rights---,” according to the in-house promotional statement from the University of Georgia Press,” his writing, and ultimately his life, were filled with ambiguities and contradictions” (University of Georgia Press Spring/Summer 2014 catalogue, 6).  The 1960s, a transformative decade in our history, was also pregnant with other movements not begat by black Americans, and that fact is unavoidable in constructing a biography of Henry Dumas (1934-1968).

In “Confessions of a Burned-Out Biographer” (The Seductions of Biography. Ed. Mary Rhiel  and David Suchoff. New York: Routledge, 1996), Phyllis Rose reminds us that “the school of literary biography, whether or not the subject is a literary figure, tends to see all facts as artifacts and to see context and argument as co-partners of fact” (131).  The public, Rose claims, prefers “objective biography” to the artistry of literary biography.  Jeffrey B. Leak seems to have embraced the alleged preferences of the public sphere in writing Visible Man: The Life of Henry Dumas.

Leak’s signifying on the title of Ralph Ellison’s masterpiece in his own title is a signal, a red flag: subject the biography of Henry Dumas to very critical “close reading.”  Doing so yields a discovery.  When a literary figure is encased in “object biography,” the subject becomes overwhelmingly visible, but the sterling values of the subject’s contributions to the republic of American letters become muted or downright invisible.

My response to Leak’s Visible Man is ambivalent.  I am sensitive to Leak’s frustration that many crucial documents of fact are beyond recovery at present or were destroyed.  I respect his fidelity to academic rigor and constraints of objectivity.  I am critical of an effort he did not make in writing the biography. Unlike Margaret Walker who dared to take risks in her biography of Richard Wright, Leak hesitates to explore the genuinely literary expression of Dumas’s daemonic genius.  The creative torment which manifested itself in his “giving the Black Experience a core and a basic set of symbols/myths that connect it to the original labyrinth of African thought,” as Eugene B. Redmond, Dumas’s literary executive, argued in introductory remarks for Rope of Wind and Other Stories (New York: Random House, 1979) is the location of Dumas’s primal value for contemporary readers.  If one substitutes “black experiences” for “the Black Experience,” the value rises.  So too does the necessity of enfolding substantive literary analysis with quantitative contextual analysis of life history.  Leak does use references to literary works to buttress and illustrate key points about the life journey. He does not bring into full view the aesthetic features of Dumas’s poetry and prose that could validate our claiming (or seeing why) Dumas was one of America’s most extraordinarily gifted writers and thinkers, a fit companion for such troubled geniuses as John Coltrane, Bob Kaufman, Amiri Baraka, and Cecil Taylor.

How can one bid a new generation of readers to rediscover Henry Dumas without weaving literary analysis of his works, of his uncanny innovations and imagination, with the chronological threads of his life?  Especially if one likens Dumas to Countee Cullen and frames his life and art in the ambience of mystery. Despite the praise in blurbs from Keith Gilyard and Yusef Komunyakaa, Visible Man is troubling in this regard. Leak’s treatment of Dumas’s marriage and extra-marital adventures ----artifacts begging for integration with the facts of art ----is problematic. What leaks from the book is a subjective correlative with the portrayal of Cross Damon and Eva Blount in The Outsider. This draws attention to one of the qualified witnesses for Dumas, namely the equally gifted poet Jay Wright. Wright’s 1969 introduction for Poetry for My People (retitled Play Ebony, Play Ivory for the Random House edition) is evidence of his unique insights about Dumas’s poetics.  Wright exercised ethical prudence in not giving Leak an extensive interview about Dumas.  His silence in 2014 must be accounted an act of integrity and love, one that is rare in a time that has zero tolerance for privacy.

To be sure, we must respect Leak’s scholarship in reaching into an ark of bones and bringing forth a skeleton upon which one can paste fragments of skin. It would be ungenerous to minimize Leak’s achievement.  Nevertheless, literary history demands a supplemental study of Dumas’s art. Leak concludes that “in a sense, the mainstream literary world is finally catching up with this most visible man” (166). The statement is premature.  Imprisoned by its habits of benign neglect, the so-called American mainstream will only botch the job of catching up. On the contrary, it is a critical consciousness of world literature that must reclaim Henry Dumas and pay appropriate tribute.

Ludwig, Samuel, ed. On the Aesthetic Legacy of Ishmael Reed: Contemporary Reassessments.  Huntington Beach, CA:  World Parade Books, 2013. The fourteen critical essays in this work demonstrate why, according to Ludwig, some young European and American literary scholars esteem Reed as “a very special kind of grey-haired sage.”  This is reassuring.  In the past decade, few critics have been brave enough to confess that they have respect for Reed’s controversial views on contemporary life.  Reed is a major dissenting voice in the republic of American letters, a stalwart champion of unfettered multiculturalism, an intellectual who is appropriately combative in the negative Eden where mass media bombards the public with bogus and dangerously deceptive “multiculturalisms.”

O’Dell, Jack. Climbin’ Jacob’s Ladder: The Black Freedom Movement Writings of Jack O’Dell.  Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.  In the frantic rush to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of events within the frame of the Civil Rights Movement (especially Mississippi’s Freedom Summer 1964), it is easy to refuse to remember Jack O’Dell’s roles in civil and human rights struggles on the larger stage of international actions against racism and multiple forms of oppression and exploitation. It is easy to forget what he understood about labor. Reading O’Dell’s pointed writings can help to revitalize the authentic functions of African American remembering. O’Dell helps us to remember that the capitalism we tend to embrace without question is indeed “a parasitic variety that lacks social substance, operationally thrives on satisfying short-term greed, and has no public conscience” (292). O’Dell reminds us that if our celebration of change minimizes trenchant critiques, we have only ourselves to blame for the continuing and overwhelming success of benign genocide.

Peterson, Carla L. Black Gotham: A Family History of African Americans in Nineteenth-Century New York City. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011. Some African Americans are reluctant to talk about the facts of intraracial class divisions, but Peterson’s exacting research on the history of her family challenges the ideological posture of silence for all the right reasons. The black elite of the nineteenth century shared with blues people the unconstitutional denial of full citizenship in the United States that was perpetuated by American law and social custom, and their primary mode of fighting for inclusion was predicated on “emphasis on education, a Protestant ethic of hard work, and strict adherence to a code of respectability”(7). Despite the fact that law and social practices changed in the 20th and 21st centuries, the systemic features of exclusion prevail, Obama’s two elections notwithstanding.  Peterson’s detective work and use of private and public documents is a praiseworthy instance of what might be termed “autobiographical collective biography,” and as such, Black Gotham establishes warrants for black non-elites and elites alike to assume responsibility for telling their divergent, class-marked histories inside the fishbowl of discriminating American history.

 

Pfister, Arthur.  My Name Is New Orleans: 40 Years of Poetry and Other Jazz.  Donaldsonville, LA: Margaret Media, Inc., 2009.  When Broadside Press issued Pfister’s first collection Beer Cans Bullets Things & Pieces (1972), Imamu Amiri Baraka wrote the introduction. He noted that “Pfister is better heard than read, tho to read him is to get turned on by the surface of the live rhythms leaving” (5). Pfister elaborates Baraka’s cryptic praise by re-inventing Marcus B. Christian’s I Am New Orleans & Other Poems (New Orleans: Xavier Review Press, 1994) and publishing a second collection that must be heard first in order to begin grasping how frenetic poetic energy finds its text in exceptionally challenging typography. As one of our earliest spoken word jazz poets, Pfister demands that we listen to his work with the attentiveness we accord the music of Cecil Taylor and read it by using procedures the critic Tony Bolden suggests ought to be used in dealing with  orature that is predicated “on communal and egalitarian precepts always already inscribed in the ritualistic template of Afrocentric funk” (The Funk Era and Beyond 229). Pfister’s work has the swagger which establishes remarkable distance from assumptions of modernist decorum explicit in Christian’s poetry, although both he and Christian evoke aesthetic transactions that are firmly rooted in the cultural historicity of New Orleans.

 

Rodney, Walter. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard University Press, 1974; revised edition 1981. Rodney’s groundbreaking study of how colonialism and neo-colonialism have produced extremes of turmoil and inequality on the continent of Africa enables a rigorous critique of Thomas Piketty’s widely acclaimed Capitalism in the Twenty-first Century (2014).

 

Rodriguez, Richard. Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography. New York: Viking, 2013.

As a writerly act of defiance and discovery, Rodriguez published Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard Rodriguez in 1982. In the contexts of stereotyped machismo and socially imagined American desire, the book was a triumph of ethnic spirit. It exploited the seductiveness of American literary history. The main title was a slantwise echo of Richard Wright’s American Hunger; his subtitle, an appropriation of The Education of Henry Adams. It reiterated the indeterminate properties of autobiography as a genre as well as the articulation of ethnicity. One could read the book as a post-modern signifying on Booker T. Washington’s Up From Slavery, if one deemed both autobiographies to be success stories. An uncommon reader might contrast Hunger of Memory with Eudora Welty’s One Writer’s Beginnings (1984) to ponder gender, ethnic and class differences in American writing. One imagines Rodriguez took a tip from Wright in meditating on alienation, especially in distancing himself from the assumptions of Mexican American Catholic decorum and from parents who were “always mindful of the line separating public from private life.” Rodriguez wanted a consumed cake to remain intact. There was daring in his belief that he could “scorn those who attempt to create an experience of intimacy in public” while he willed himself “to think there is a place for the deeply personal in public life.” Such ambivalence comes with a price tag. It puts its thumb on the psychological sundering associated with fictions of double or triple consciousness. Like a brutal collection agency, it demands a reckoning from the autobiographer ----“Pay up or else….”Thirty-one years after his noteworthy success with Hunger, Rodriguez pays up with accumulated interest in Darling. He commits unclad intimacy in public. His scorn boomerangs, knocking him into a pool with Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice. Not having read Brown and Days of Obligation, the books he wrote after his secular autobiography, I only guess that Rodriguez experienced a crisis of Catholicism. Darling suggests that he found himself standing on sand, attempting to learn desert religion and getting no response from Allah, Yahweh, and God. The Semitic trinity mocks him by abandoning him. Such justice is the reward for those who are not acquainted with Egyptian monotheism or the “Great Hymn to the One God Aten Unfortunately, Rodriguez’s concept of the spiritual is too manipulative and commercial, too camp and crass, and too theatrical to inspire conversion and enlightenment. In that sense, Darling is a brilliant exposition of how, with the singular exception of James Baldwin, Americans understand little about spirit and soul.

 

Saloy, Mona Lisa. Second Line Home. Kirksville, MO: Truman State University Press, 2014. Saloy’s collection Red Beans and Ricely Yours was chosen by Ishmael Reed to receive the 2005 T. S. Eliot Prize. Evoking a New Orleans ritual of loss and reconciliation, the poems in Second Line Home are decidedly rhythmic utterances about knowing what it means to be in the Crescent City. It is worthwhile to contrast Saloy’s poetry with that of Sybil Kein in Gumbo People (New Orleans: Margaret Media, Inc., 1999) to grasp the diverging paths of Creole cultures in Louisiana.

 

Scott, Nathan A., Jr. Visions of Presence in Modern American Poetry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.  One of the most brilliant thinkers of his generation, Scott devoted much of his work to studies of the moral dimensions of existentialism, American Establishment and European writers, and problems of theological signification in poetry and fiction. Perhaps at some point in this century, critics will again recognize the enduring value of Scott’s thinking and use it to produce fresh discussions of African American literature.

Washington, Mary Helen. The Other Blacklist: The African American Literary and Cultural Left of the 1950s. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.  An excellent model of necessary scholarship, this book offers stimulating perspectives on the works of Julian Mayfield, Charles White, Gwendolyn Brooks, Lloyd L. Brown, Alice Childress, and Frank London Brown. A superb and principled scholar, Washington provides a reassuring alternative to excessive genuflections before the altars of the canonized, the critical rituals that hinder genuine progress in the construction of literary and cultural histories. Washington has made a noteworthy contribution to the profession and the growth of knowledge.

 

 

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.               May 4, 2014

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Lenard D. Moore: Introducing His Ocular Voice


The Ocular Voice


 

     Lenard D. Moore’s A Million Shadows At Noon is a poetic memoir of a day of

 

atonement, that fateful gathering in Washington, D.C. on October 16, 1995 where a

 

million plus men willed to absent themselves from the banality of human evil.  It was a

 

special moment in the history of African American emotions, and it resists having its

 

symbolism resymbolized.  The March, or our memory of the ritual, does not resist

 

serving as the ground for creation.  As one of the leading haiku poets in the United States,

 

Moore understands how deceptively simple forms can be used to make complexity

 

accessible.  His earlier book, Desert Storm: A Brief History (1993), demonstrates how

 

an Oriental form can enable a poet to avoid some of the limitations of Occidental

 

narrative poetry.  We do not need yet another narrative about October 16, 1995.  We do

 

welcome a poem that enables us to recollect our powerful emotional responses to that day

 

and to consider how dim or vivid are our memories now.

 

     However much this poem reminds us of Moore’s earlier work, it does represent a

 

departure.  Here the poet has conceptualized his poem as a space for the ocular voice, the

 

voice that is intimately linked with the photographic and with the hearer’s use of words

 

as tools for visualizing.  Each segment (or caption as it were) demands our supplying a

 

relevant image from our visual archive—depth, color, magnitude, texture, shape,

 

illumination.  Such a demand is implicit in the philosophical underpinning of haiku.  But

 

the haiku segments in A Million Shadows At Noon are not independent instances.  Each

 

is a stage in a movement from dawn to dusk to the newly promised dawn.  As we

 

experience the full movement, we begin to sense how radical, successful, and

 

 

 

empowering the poem is.  Like Sterling A. Brown’s “Strong Men,” this poem is a well-

 

crafted example of how the poet induces readers to engage in aesthetic/political activity.

 

     After we have photomemoried A Million Shadows At Noon, we discover the

 

anticipated future is brought to personal closure.  The dominance of the optical is

 

displaced by sound, the invisible eye being transformed into the speaking subject.

 

The silent witness is embodied fully as

 

     night after the march

     reading the million-man pledge

     to my pregnant wife

 

the poet/photographer elicits the absent vows

 

     I will  strive     to love, to improve, to build

       will  never      raise my hand/abuse my wife/

                             engage in abuse of children/

                             use the “B” word

       will  not         poison my body

       will                support, do all this

 

At the final center of remembering is man speaking to woman who contains and

 

nurtures the promised future, the child as continuity, biological verity, and love!

 

In the end of A Million Shadows At Noon is the initial moment Lenard D. Moore

 

and his readers share.

 

 

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

Moss Chair of Excellence in English

University of Memphis

March 17, 1996

 
**The full title of Moore's unpublished collection is
A Million Shadows at Noon (A Haiku Sequence)
 

 

 

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Richard Rodriguez and Autobiograpy


Notes on Richard Rodriguez and Autobiography

 

Rodriguez, Richard. Darling: A Spiritual Autobiography.  New York: Viking, 2013.

 

 

As a writerly act of defiance and discovery, Rodriguez published Hunger of Memory: The Education of Richard Rodriguez in 1982.  In the contexts of stereotyped machismo and socially imagined American desire, the book was a triumph of ethnic spirit.  It exploited the seductiveness of American literary history.  The main title was a slantwise echo of Richard Wright’s American Hunger; his subtitle, an appropriation of The Education of Henry Adams. It reiterated the indeterminate properties of autobiography as a genre as well as the articulation of ethnicity. One could read the book as a post-modern signifying on Booker T. Washington’s Up From Slavery, if one deemed both autobiographies to be success stories. An uncommon reader might contrast Hunger of Memory with Eudora Welty’s One Writer’s Beginnings (1984) to ponder gender, ethnic and class differences in American writing.  One imagines Rodriguez took a tip from Wright in meditating on alienation, especially in distancing himself from the assumptions of Mexican American Catholic decorum and from parents who were “always mindful of the line separating public from private life.”  Rodriguez wanted a consumed cake to remain intact.

 

There was daring in his belief that he could “scorn those who attempt to create an experience of intimacy in public” while he willed himself “to think there is a place for the deeply personal in public life.” Such ambivalence comes with a price tag. It puts its thumb on the psychological sundering associated with fictions of double or triple consciousness. Like a brutal collection agency, it demands a reckoning from the autobiographer ----“Pay up or else….”

 

Thirty-one years after his noteworthy success with Hunger, Rodriguez pays up with accumulated interest in Darling. He commits unclad intimacy in public. His scorn boomerangs, knocking him into a pool with Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice. Not having read Brown and Days of Obligation, the books he wrote after his secular autobiography, I only guess that Rodriguez experienced a crisis of Catholicism. Darling suggests that he found himself standing on sand, attempting to learn desert religion and getting no response from Allah, Yahweh, and God. The Semitic trinity mocks him by abandoning him. Such justice is the reward for those who are not acquainted with Egyptian monotheism or the “Great Hymn to the One God Aten.”

 

 Unfortunately, Rodriguez’s concept of the spiritual is too manipulative and commercial, too camp and crass, and too theatrical to inspire conversion and enlightenment. In that sense, Darling is a brilliant exposition of how, with the singular exception of James Baldwin, Americans understand little about spirit and soul.

 

 

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

April 23, 2014

Monday, April 21, 2014

Why Teach?


Inaugural Symposium: Why the Liberal Arts?                                                       Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

Randolph College

April 25, 2014

 

 

 

WHY TEACH?  WHY ADVISE? : HISTORY AND THINKING

 

I deeply appreciate the honor of being invited by President Bradley Bateman and the Randolph College family to share a few ideas about the liberal arts, teaching and advising. The ideas are inflected by companion ideas regarding creativity and service, the subject matter of a slightly different discourse. Thus, I focus on what I have been invited to address.

 

In the antiquity of Greek imagination, liberal arts (artes liberals) were essential for citizenship. A citizen was obligated to master rhetoric, the art of persuasion and public speaking; to have skill in forensic science or the art of defense in court and in making juridical decisions; to render service military and otherwise. Grammar, logic, and rhetoric (the trivium) were valued. These were amplified in medieval Europe to include the quadrivium (arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy/astrology). In later iterations, logic was subordinated to accommodate history and moral philosophy (ethics), and studia humanitatis ascended, becoming the foundation for what in contemporary thought is a liberal arts education.

In 2014, as if we are existentially obligated to replay the debates “between the upholders of antiquity and those of modernity in the seventeenth century” (Jones vii) regarding the rise of the scientific movement, we concern ourselves with STEM versus the humanities.  We hear the humorous noise of Jonathan Swift’s “A Full and True Account of the Battel Fought Last Friday, between the Antient and the Modern Books in St. James’s Library,” echoes of C. P. Snow’s The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, and the dirges in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s Animal Farm.  Shall citizens who ought to be agents of history in a republic where critical thinking is valued become drones of a State where the supreme values are those of capital and relentless information technologies?  The possibility of such accomplished future shock makes the interrelated questions ---Why Teach? Why Advise? ---crucial for how we choose now to deal with destiny and retain some control of our lives.

Permit me to quote famous words:

“In this rapidly changing world, there is no better preparation than learning and to work with other people to solve problems.  It is also true that the world of work becomes more international and more complex every day.  A liberal education prepares you very well to see the world from multiple perspectives.  In this sense, liberal education is the ultimate ‘career preparation’.”

“I see Randolph as a leader in the national debate about the importance of liberal education in the 21st century.”

[Randolph-Macon Woman’s College Alumnae and Randolph College Alumni Bulletin 4.2 (2013): 22, 24]

In short, President Bateman was saying the liberal arts can reduce chaos to order.

My brief remarks are explanatory footnotes for Bateman’s ideas. In the bloodless warfare entanglement requires, teaching and advising are practices watered with morality, concepts of justice, and imagination; they are actions that bespeak citizenship and membership in global societies. For over forty years, the art and joy of teaching and the ethical onus of advising have my life. The imperatives of David Walker’s 1829 Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World and the grains of wisdom I have obtained from Plato’s Republic, Machiavelli’s The Prince, DuBois’s The Souls of Black Folk, and Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions have influenced my sometimes tense, often rich, and always rewarding   engagements with students and colleagues. My discipline is English, the study of language and literature with special interest in literary theory and criticism and African American literature. From David Walker I learned how the so-called wretched of the earth were obligated to destroy the material and psychological restraints on their freedom imposed by those who violated their minds and bodies. Plato taught me the difference between a statesman and a politician and the diverse outcomes of morality in social space. From Machiavelli I learned the value of being skeptical.  DuBois instructed me how best to use the strength and resilience of my soul so as not to be crushed by the uncertainties of secular power and the unfolding of histories. From Kuhn I learned the importance of empirical evidence, patience, and exactness in changing from one paradigm of cognition to another. I delighted in teaching and transmitting what I absorbed; life drove me to see my work as a vocation not a job. My vocation would have been incomplete had I not helped my students to identify their options for action and to retreat so they would freely assume responsibility of their choices.

Teachers of my generation who taught at Randolph were most likely as invested as I was in a pedagogy which maximized the importance of making connections between our chosen disciplines and those we chose not to pursue. I was transgressive and subversive with a purpose, determined that my students would at once master specific content and be conversant with what was emphasized in other areas of study and acquisition of knowledge. Walls between disciplines in the humanities, pure and applied sciences, and the human or social sciences are maintained for discursive convenience.  Those who live fully, who embrace a liberal arts education, boldly walk through them to go where they have never been.  I share President Bateman’s belief that a liberal education prepares us for multiple careers and meaningful lives.

WORK CITED:  Jones, Richard Foster. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in Seventeenth Century England. 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965.

 

 

 

Sunday, April 20, 2014

On Inequality


Theorems, Theories, and Limits

From time to time, a French thinker writes a work that has everyday use for Americans.  Voltaire’s Candide, Rousseau’s The Social Contract, Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America, and Camus’ The Stranger come to mind. Add to that list Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Distracting rhetoric from Democrats and Republicans about the widening gap between poverty and wealth in our country makes listening to what Paul Krugman calls a “sweeping meditation on inequality” a rather sobering exercise.

Piketty goes beyond the American boundaries of Robert B. Reich’s The Work of Nations, which alludes to Adam Smith’s class The Wealth of Nations. He provokes liberal signifying on Karl Marx’s Das Kapital. None of this is surprising.  What does take us aback is the equation of Piketty with a “rock star,” in certain sectors of mass media, as if his serious inquiry about inequality is as disposable as transnational noise.  It is not.

Piketty deserves to be critiqued seriously for what he exposes about economics as a “contingent” science and about the limits of explanation. Lacking the finite certitude of pure mathematics, economics is culture-bound, determined by human choices and the amoral activities of Nature, activities oblivious to the needs and desires of people, lesser animals, and other life forms. Oddly, the efforts to trivialize the real value of Piketty’s work only highlight why his theorems and reasoning are not “universal.”

Based on statistical analysis of megadata from France, the United States, and Britain, Capital neither address nor provides a model for addressing “universal” issues in the global tragicomedy of capital. It is a Western tool that smashes complacent thought about inequality in the United States; the tool simply breaks when it strikes the economic walls of Asia and Africa. Alternative tools are needed.

Take Nigeria as a target for analysis of inequality in the context of rampant neo-colonialism. Understanding of Nigerian inequality (and perhaps that of other countries impacted by Islamic fervor) requires such an instrument as Adetoro Rasheed Adenrele’s “Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria as a symptom of poverty and political alienation,” Journal of Humanities and Social Science 3.5 (2012): 21-26.

Adenrele’s article lacks the Western elegance and rigor of Piketty’s book, but it has the indigenous eloquence and specificity necessary for dealing with inequality in such contemporary African societies as Mali, Egypt, Senegal, and Libya.  What it models can possibly be expanded and adapted by Asian economists to deal with the Asian giants China and India.  Adenrele’s use of fundamentalist theory, poverty theory, and corruption theory is not sufficiently cold, but it inches toward solid explanation of capital and human collapse. However divergent the work of Adenrele and Piketty might be, the primal lesson to be learned from both thinkers is the inevitable recognition of the limits of critical reasoning, the restriction of cognitive capacity explored in David Faust’s The Limits of Scientific Reasoning. Both thinkers raise crucial, non-universal questions about inequality and apocalyptic journeys in history.

Jerry W. Ward, Jr.

April 20, 2014